Local Franchise Owners Need Certainty

BEFORE 2015

Stability

Franchisors were only responsible for workers they directly hired and managed. This meant they could freely help franchisees with in-store training and business guidance without legal risk.

2015-2020

Browning-Ferris Expansion

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) changed the rules so that even indirect involvement could make franchisors legally responsible for franchisee employees. The vague new standard triggered a 93% jump in litigation costs as everyone tried to figure out what was now considered “control.”

2020

Temporary Relief

After years of this chaos, a new NLRB rule said franchisors were only responsible if they had direct, hands-on control over hiring, firing, and wages. The industry stabilized, but everyone knew the rule could change again with the next administration…

2023

Crisis Returns

And so it did. The NLRB went back to the 2015 approach. Franchisors faced legal exposure again, forcing another round of lawsuits and uncertainty.

2024

Another Reversal

A federal court blocked the 2023 rule. A win for franchising, but it highlighted the core problem: as long as the rules come from agencies and courts instead of Congress, they’ll keep changing with each new administration. Businesses can’t plan when the foundation shifts every 4 years.

2025

A Legislative Solution

The American Franchise Act would write the rule into federal law. Congress makes it the standard permanent, ending the back-and-forth that’s caused so much uncertainty for franchise business owners.

$33.3B

376,000

93%

The American Franchise Act (H.R. 5267) doesn’t change the fundamental relationship between franchisors and franchisees. It simply clarifies what’s always been true: providing support for franchisees is not the same as controlling their employees.

For Catie, who owns and operates an Aroma Joe’s in Maine, that clarity matters, and The American Franchise Act protects her independence. 

How? By establishing that a franchisor is a joint employer ONLY if they exert substantial, direct, and immediate control over essential employment terms–things like hiring, wages, or work schedules…

Share this page on social, or take action and write to your members of Congress today. Let’s make sure everyone understands what independent ownership really means, and what it takes to protect it.

Take Action